<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society - recent issues</title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1752-1386</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1752-1378</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/265?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/17?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/157?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Online Resources</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial Statement]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial Statement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Innovation, networks and knowledge exchange]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopherson, S., Kitson, M., Michie, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Innovation, networks and knowledge exchange]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The spatial dimension of knowledge flows: a simulation approach]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Drawing on a conceptual framework, the Information Space or I-Space, and using agent-based simulation, our paper offers a theoretical exploration of the spatial dimensions of knowledge management. By modelling two well-known cases of high-tech industrial clusters, Silicon Valley and Boston Route 128, we look at the interrelationship between knowledge management strategies adopted by firms and the latter's choice of spatial location, as well as how it is affected by the evolution of information and communication technologies (ICTs). We find that knowledge structuring and spatial agglomeration co-evolve and that such co-evolution is significantly altered by the development of ICTs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canals, A., Boisot, M., MacMillan, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[L96 - Telecommunications, O33 - Technological Change: Choices and [...], R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional [...], R58 - Regional Development Policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The spatial dimension of knowledge flows: a simulation approach]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic models of regional innovation: explorations with British time-series data]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this paper, we analyse a new dataset on innovation in the British regions from 1990 to 2006. We interpret these data as representing the rate of growth of investment in innovation which we analyse using a range of estimators. The paper explores the role of macro- and microeconomic determinants of innovation. In addition to standard determinants that help to explain the decline in innovation from the late 1990s, our findings also support the hypothesis of path dependence in innovation and the importance of human capital. These findings are consistent with the literature on absorptive capacity and suggest a role for regional policies to promote investment in innovation and training as well as appropriate macroeconomic policies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Driver, C., Oughton, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[L60 - General, R10 - General]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic models of regional innovation: explorations with British time-series data]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>217</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Models for university technology transfer: resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The conversion of university research into economic growth is vital for the future of many nations. In order to improve the efficiency of this transfer, we have looked at the effectiveness of technology transfer activity in the USA. Our research indicates that universities that are not located in a region with a supportive innovation system should modify their mission and methods for technology transfer. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, the authors develop an overview of the problem and recommend three new strategies for effective technology transfer including the application of regional dynamic knowledge networks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren, A., Hanke, R., Trotzer, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[O32 - Management of Technological Innovation [...]]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Models for university technology transfer: resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: in what sense a regional problem?]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/233?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>To explore the contradictions and problems apparent in contemporary policy towards universities, this article reviews two parallel but related debates: the debate about competitive and prosperous regions and the debate about excellent institutions of research and higher education. It questions whether it is necessary, or always healthy, to conflate the processes behind excellence in regional innovation and economic development with excellence in university research, education and collaboration. In other words, while we agree that universities contribute to innovation, it is less clear how they contribute to regional innovation and still less clear how they contribute to regional innovation systems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power, D., Malmberg, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[O10 - General, O30 - General, R10 - General, R50 - General]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: in what sense a regional problem?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/247?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Engineering networks: university-industry networks in Southern Ontario automotive industry clusters]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/247?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this paper we examine relationships between university engineering programmes at the Universities of Waterloo and Windsor and the automobile industry in Southern Ontario which reflect TNC strategies and state innovation policies which place greater emphasis on universities developing networks with automotive manufacturers. We argue firstly that there are tensions within the academy as university based researcher becomes more applied and as issues of intellectual property (IP) rights ownership arise. Secondly knowledge flows are principally directed towards OEM global pipelines and to a much less extent to the regional clusters of small and medium sized (SME) producers. We conclude by considering the implications of intensifying networks between universities and OEMs in Southern Ontario on innovation and cluster policy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rutherford, T., Holmes, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[D21 - Firm Behavior, D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; [...]]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Engineering networks: university-industry networks in Southern Ontario automotive industry clusters]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>264</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/265?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Constructing entrepreneurial advantage: consensus building, technological uncertainty and emerging industries]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/265?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 1976, Cambridge, MA, and Berkeley, CA, responded to concerns about the environmental effects of recombinant DNA by adopting identical biosafety ordinances. This paper explores the mediating factors that explain how scientists and entrepreneurs came to view these regulatory interventions in diametrically distinct ways. We argue that although the regulations were the same, the process behind their adoption and implementation and, in particular, differences in citizen engagement and technology education account for these divergent outcomes. The paper suggests ways that contemporary regulatory responses can result in a constructive (rather than combative) approach to entrepreneurial accountability and thus contribute to constructed jurisdictional advantage.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowe, N., Feldman, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[L26 -  Entrepreneurship, L50 - [Regulation and Industrial Policy] General, O10 - General, O30 - General]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Constructing entrepreneurial advantage: consensus building, technological uncertainty and emerging industries]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>284</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Triple Helix in the periphery: the case of Multipolis in Northern Finland]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Peripheral areas are rarely considered as having an active role within the field of high technology. This article studies the public sector initiative Multipolis, which fosters high-technology development based on the Triple Helix co-operation in the peripheral Northern Finland. The article analyses how high-technology enterprises in Northern Finland collaborate with higher education and research institutes to achieve product innovations, and how Multipolis is managed as an innovation network. The research material comprises regional and innovation policy documents and statistics, a survey among high-technology enterprises, Multipolis project reports and thematic interviews. The Multipolis network generally follows national innovation and regional policies. The simultaneous implementation of these policies is, however, challenging.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jauhiainen, J. S., Suorsa, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[O10 - General, O18 - Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Triple Helix in the periphery: the case of Multipolis in Northern Finland]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>301</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oxfordshire biomedical university spin-offs: an evolving system]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The creation of university spin-offs and the development of its biotechnology industry are two of the UK's and many other countries' top research-to-commercialisation priorities. Usually more is known about the numbers of spin-offs than their performance. This paper analyses the performance of 56 biomedical spin-offs from Oxfordshire's universities and public sector research laboratories with respect to human resources, the degree of innovative capability and internationalisation. In so doing, it explores the contribution of this group of firms to the evolution of science-based industry in this particular location which is one of the UK's leading centres of research and innovation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, H. L., Romeo, S., Bagchi-Sen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[O31 - Innovation and Invention: [...]]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oxfordshire biomedical university spin-offs: an evolving system]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/2/321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper critically reviews the structure and function of regional knowledge networks and modes of engagement between universities and the business community. It is argued that while networks between universities and the business community are growing, it is often difficult to ascribe improved regional competitiveness to developments in knowledge-based infrastructure. It is also argued that the engagement between universities and the business community must be based on an understanding of the role of both network and market-based knowledge interactions. It is concluded that the onus placed on universities to become bases of commercializable knowledge in many regions is probably too heavy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huggins, R., Johnston, A., Steffenson, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[O31 - Innovation and Invention: [...], O32 - Management of Technological Innovation [...], R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth [...], R58 - Regional Development Policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>340</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Online Resources</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial: Poverty and place in the UK and the USA]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glasmeier, A., Martin, R., Tyler, P., Dorling, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsn004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial: Poverty and place in the UK and the USA]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>16</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/17?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neo-liberal poverty governance: race, place and the punitive turn in US welfare policy]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/17?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article provides empirical evidence on the operation and effects of the neo-liberal system of poverty governance emerging in the United States. Relying on data collected on Florida, a state recognized for innovation in implementing welfare reform, we present findings that demonstrate systematic inequities in the way sanctions are applied to clients who fail to comply with participation requirements in Florida's welfare-to-work programme. Our findings underscore how the enduring influence of race, place and their interaction are critical to the emerging neo-liberal system of poverty governance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schram, S. F., Fording, R. C., Soss, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government, I30 - General, I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of [...]]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neo-liberal poverty governance: race, place and the punitive turn in US welfare policy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>36</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/37?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Area variations in household income across Great Britain]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/37?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Researchers and policy makers have long been interested in the spatial distribution of income. But we lack a balanced assessment of the extent to which the national pattern of inequality is attributable to variation <I>between</I> areas, or whether, on the contrary, there is wide variation between households <I>within</I> areas. One difficulty has been a lack of area-based incomes data. This paper uses an under-exploited source to undertake this decomposition at a series of levels of geographical aggregation. The concluding section considers whether the area variations identified are large or small&mdash;is the glass half full, or half empty?</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berthoud, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty, R13 - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic [...]]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Area variations in household income across Great Britain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>49</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Race and the micro-scale spatial concentration of poverty]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper uses block-group data from the US decennial censuses to document changes in concentrated poverty. It provides several substantive and methodological lessons. First, the majority of poor sub-county areas were located (and hidden) in low poverty counties. Second, the 1990s brought large declines in the share of high-poverty (sub-county) areas and the share of people, including poor people, who lived in them. Third, poor minorities&mdash;both in metro and non-metro areas&mdash;are highly ghettoized in high-poverty neighbourhoods and are highly segregated from whites and the nonpoor population. Discussions of concentrated poverty cannot be uncoupled from minority residence patterns.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., Taquino, M. C., Beaulieu, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[I30 - General, N30 - General, International, or Comparative]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Race and the micro-scale spatial concentration of poverty]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Male worklessness and the rise of lone parenthood in Great Britain]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Deindustrialization has eliminated many traditionally male jobs in Great Britain. Using geographical comparisons based on Census data, this paper estimates that the resulting fall in male employment explains between 38% and 59% of the 1.16m increase in lone parent families over the period 1971&ndash;2001. The impact was greatest in the areas which suffered most from industrial decline. Higher male employment would help to contain, and maybe reverse, the growth of lone parenthood, by reducing inflows into lone parenthood and increasing outflows through re-partnering and consequent stepfamily formation. Female employment is found to have no consistent net effect on lone parenthood.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rowthorn, R., Webster, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty, J11 - Demographic Trends and Forecasts, J12 - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure, J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Male worklessness and the rise of lone parenthood in Great Britain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Poverty and inequality across space: sociological reflections on the missing-middle subnational scale]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The study of stratification is a foremost concern of sociologists. Historical engagement with this topic creates a distinct conceptual lens on poverty and inequality and a voluminous body of empirical work that set sociology apart from economics and to some degree, geography. At the same time, the discipline is limited in developing a spatial understanding of stratification processes. In this article, we put forth a critique of sociological research on poverty and other inequalities across space. We focus on a disciplinary impasse, the lack of a coherent, well-developed tradition at the subnational or regional scale. Drawing from research on the United States, we address how sociologists are making inroads against this impasse, in an emergent body of work.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lobao, L. M., Hooks, G., Tickamyer, A. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[I30 - General, J60 - General, R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth [...], R40 - General]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Poverty and inequality across space: sociological reflections on the missing-middle subnational scale]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The place of 'place' in theories of poverty: mobility, social capital and well-being]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article argues that theories about the spatial distribution of poverty since World War II have always combined analyses of the impact of the built environment, of culture and of mobility of populations. However, the form taken by these combinations has varied with the logic of the underlying political economy adopted by governments in the USA, UK and continental Europe. The author argues that a new version may be emerging, reflecting ideas from theory on social capital and well-being.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[H30 - General, H40 - General, I30 - General, O20 - General]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The place of 'place' in theories of poverty: mobility, social capital and well-being]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>129</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Place-based policy and rural poverty: insights from the urban spatial mismatch literature]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Unless there are spatial barriers that limit adjustment, economists argue that policies to alleviate poverty should focus on poor people, not poor places. Akin to urban spatial mismatch hypotheses, we develop a distance-based friction explanation of higher rural poverty. Empirical examination of US poverty supports these frictions as partly underlying higher rural poverty. This follows from assessing the relationship between poverty and remoteness as well as labour supply responses. Higher rural poverty does not appear to be a simple result of the poor self-selecting to live in remote areas. The results suggest that place-based anti-poverty policies may be beneficial.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty, R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional [...], R23 - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; [...]]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Place-based policy and rural poverty: insights from the urban spatial mismatch literature]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Poverty amidst plenty; some recent reflections]]></title>
<link>http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farrigan, T. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cjres/rsm011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Poverty amidst plenty; some recent reflections]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Cambridge Political Economy Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>161</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book review essay</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>