© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
The world is not flat: putting globalization in its place
a Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, 129 Sibley, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. smc23@cornell.edu
b Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, PO Box, 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands. j.h.garretsen@rug.nl
c Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK. rlm1@cam.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Globalization and the flat earthers |
|---|
Since the 1990s, the term globalization has become an increasingly prominent feature of economic, social and political discourse, not just within the academic community, but also in the popular press and in the world of policy making. It is, however, a notion that is far from straightforward. Definitions and debates have proliferated around the syndrome of processes and outcomes alleged to characterize globalization.1 Everyone agrees we live in a more globalized world, but views differ as to what this means and whether it is a trend for good or ill. Those on the neoliberal right are typically pro-globalization, arguing that it has opened up markets across the globe, that it is a force for spreading opportunity
| Globalization and place |
|---|
| The world is not flat |
|---|