Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society Advance Access originally published online on June 9, 2009
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2009 2(2):267-285; doi:10.1093/cjres/rsp011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/267    most recent
rsp011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dymski, G. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow E59 - Other
Right arrow F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems
Right arrow N20 - General, International, or Comparative
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society issue: Spatial Circuits of Global Finance [View the issue table of contents]

The global financial customer and the spatiality of exclusion after the ‘end of geography’

Gary A. Dymski

University of California Center Sacramento (UCCS), 1130 K Street Suite LL22/Sacramento, CA 95814, USA. gary.dymski{at}ucop.edu


   Abstract

This paper evaluates O'Brien's assertion that freer global financial flows and movement will eliminate the significance of geography for financial processes because enhanced global choice will create the global financial customer. We argue here, contra O'Brien, that expanded global choice in finance has contributed to the widening global income/wealth divide, both in the global North and the global South. Financial globalization has not made geography immaterial: instead, spatial location, informed by each area's historical and institutional background, continues to demarcate who has access to which financial services at what price. The US subprime crisis demonstrates dramatically that vulnerability to economically devastating financial crises varies dramatically across space at the national and sub-national levels.

Keywords: financial globalization, end of geography, banking, financial crisis, financial exclusion, subprime lending

Received on December 1, 2008. Accepted on March 27, 2009.


JEL Classifications: E59, F34, G01, N20


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.