Skip Navigation


Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society Advance Access originally published online on August 6, 2008
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2008 1(3):389-410; doi:10.1093/cjres/rsn017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/3/389    most recent
rsn017v2
rsn017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow O18 - Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Right arrow O19 - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
Right arrow P10 - General
Right arrow P26 - Political Economy; Property Rights
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society issue: The World is not Flat; Putting Globalisation in its Place [View the issue table of contents]

Globalization, uneven development and capital: reflections on reading Thomas Friedman's The World Is Flat

Kevin R. Cox

Department of Geography, Ohio State University, 1106 Derby Hall, 154 North Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. cox.13{at}osu.edu


  Abstract

In his book ‘The World Is Flat’, Thomas Friedman postulates notions of ‘flatness’ that combine to suggest, on the one hand, tendencies towards an equalization of chances of economic development; and on the other, a displacement of vertical forms of organization by more horizontal ones, notably of states by markets. Drawing on historical geographical materialism, it is shown that geographically uneven development is a necessary outcome of the accumulation process; and equally, states are inevitably implicated in this outcome.

Keywords: geographically uneven development, accumulation, the state, capitalism, historical geographical materialism

Received on October 8, 2007. Accepted on June 10, 2008.

JEL Classifications:: O18, O19, P10, P26


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.