Skip Navigation

Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2008 1(1):69-88; doi:10.1093/cjres/rsm004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowthorn, R.
Right arrow Articles by Webster, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
Right arrow J11 - Demographic Trends and Forecasts
Right arrow J12 - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure
Right arrow J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Male worklessness and the rise of lone parenthood in Great Britain

Robert Rowthorn* and David Webster{dagger}

* Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 9DD, UK. rer3{at}econ.cam.ac.uk
{dagger} Glasgow City Council, City Chambers, Glasgow, G2 1DU, UK and Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RS, UK. david.webster{at}drs.glasgow.gov.uk


   Abstract

Deindustrialization has eliminated many traditionally male jobs in Great Britain. Using geographical comparisons based on Census data, this paper estimates that the resulting fall in male employment explains between 38% and 59% of the 1.16m increase in lone parent families over the period 1971–2001. The impact was greatest in the areas which suffered most from industrial decline. Higher male employment would help to contain, and maybe reverse, the growth of lone parenthood, by reducing inflows into lone parenthood and increasing outflows through re-partnering and consequent stepfamily formation. Female employment is found to have no consistent net effect on lone parenthood.

Keywords: lone parents/parenthood, lone motherhood, female headed families, family structure, unemployment, worklessness

Received on March 27, 2007. Accepted on October 9, 2007.


JEL Classifications: I32, J11, J12, J16


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc:

Online Resources

Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc 2008 1: 1. [Extract] [Full Text]  





Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.